It is not allowed to make public accusations against another player. If problems are suspected the gamehost will be contacted in private and the problem will be explained. (If the gamehost is the suspected trouble maker player heighest on the diplo-vote scorechart that's not involved will be contacted).
The host will then pause the game and explain in public there's a problem. He'll tell the other player in pivate about which he's been accused. Both involved parties will then send a list of players to the host (in private) that are acceptable to them to judge in this case. The host will then pick the best 3 players (according to the diplo-vote chart) and ask them to judge. (The host will never judge himself). If any of the involved parties thinks one of the judges is not a suitable judge for the conflict he'll pm the host who'll assign the next best player as a judge.
Both involved players will then send a brief explanation about their own position. The host will then send this to the 3 judges. The judges will all make a personal judgement and inform the host. The host will then disclose the result of the judgement. All players will accept the final verdict and the game moves on.

Example:
Diplo Score Chart:
1. France
2. China
3. India
4. Netherlands
5. America
6. Japan
7. Korea
8. Germany
9. Canada

* China has a problem with America
* China pm's the host and explains the problem
* the host contacts America, pauses the game and explains the situation briefly
* the hosts informs both parties about the 3 judges in pm. (France, India, Netherlands)
* china pm's the host that France is not suitale b/c it's an allie of America
* The 3 judges are: India, Netherlands, Japan
* The host posts who the judges are
* America and China write a brief explanation of their case to the host by pm
* the host will send these explanations to the judges by pm (the argument will never be made public)
* the judges will make their verdict and inform the host by pm
* the host will publish the verdicts. Majority wins. In this case: America
* China accepts this verdict, perhaps after needing some Cold Turkey Time.
* The game moves on, even when everyone knows that every verdict is imperfect. After all it's only a game.

Public Accusations will always be deleted by the host from the forums.
If not 3 acceptable judges can be found outside (not in the game involved) judges will be asked by the host.